منابع مشابه
Two Conceptions of Fundamentality
This article aims to show that fundamentality is construed differently in the two most prominent strategies of analysis we find in physical science and engineering today: (1) atomistic, reductive analysis and (2) Systems analysis. Correspondingly, atomism is the conception according to which the simplest (smallest) indivisible entity of a certain kind is most fundamental; while systemism, as wi...
متن کاملFundamentality of Ridge Functions
For a given integer d, 1 ≤ d ≤ n − 1, let Ω be a subset of the set of all d × n real matrices. Define the subspace M(Ω) = span{g(Ax) : A ∈ Ω, g ∈ C(IR, IR)} . We give necessary and sufficient conditions on Ω so that M(Ω) is dense in C(IR, IR) in the topology of uniform convergence on compact subsets. This generalizes work of Vostrecov and Kreines. We also consider some related problems. §
متن کاملEssence Without Fundamentality
In Modality and Explanatory Reasoning, Boris Kment argues that a single notion of essence can be used to play two different theoretical roles. He thinks there is an important connection between essence and metaphysical necessity, on the one hand, and between essence and metaphysical explanation, on the other. It seems to me that there is a price to be paid for using a single notion of essence t...
متن کاملOn the Fundamentality of Symmetries
That symmetry is fundamental to modern physics is a view frequently expressed by physicists. In his popular expositions Steven Weinberg, for example, has aimed above all to communicate his conviction that ‘symmetries are fundamental, and possibly all that one needs to learn about the physical world beyond quantum mechanics itself’.1 His fellow particle physicist Abdus Salam has argued similarly...
متن کاملOrdering Supervaluationism, Counterpart eory, and Ersatz Fundamentality
Many philosophical theories make comparisons between objects, events, states of affairs, worlds, or systems, and many such theories deliver plausible verdicts only if some of the elements they compare are ranked as ‘best.’ When the relevant ordering does not have such ‘best’ or ‘tied for best’ elements the theory wrongly falls silent or gives badly counterintuitive results. I call these limit a...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Philosophical Perspectives
سال: 2016
ISSN: 1520-8583
DOI: 10.1111/phpe.12082